The Norwegian psycho claims that he acted in self-defense when he gunned down dozens of unarmed teenagers at a summer camp.
The real story is that the teenagers were denied the right to self-defense because there was not a rifle at the camp. One rifle could have saved dozens of lives, taken the scumbag out, and saved Norway the expense of the trial.
Norway killer admits massacre, claims self-defense
By KARL RITTER – 41 minutes ago
OSLO, Norway (AP) — A right-wing fanatic admitted Monday to unleashing a bomb-and-shooting massacre that killed 77 people in Norway but pleaded not guilty to criminal charges, saying he was acting in self-defense.
On the first day of his long-awaited trial, Anders Behring Breivik defiantly rejected the authority of the court as it sought to assign responsibility for the July 22 attacks that shocked Norway and jolted the image of terrorism in Europe.
Similarly, an English kid got killed by a Polar Bear in Norway last summer because no one in their group knew how to handle a rifle.
People can’t defend themselves from human and animal predators without a weapon. Norwegians understood this in the past.