I’m sure you agree–the Mann/Jones GRL paper was truly pathetic and should never have been published. I don’t want to be associated with that 2000 year “reconstruction”.
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/
Strange. Penn State investigators said they checked all this out and Mikey’s work was top-notch. Is it possible that Pennsylvania State University might have criminal behavior going on at the highest levels?
This had better be genuine. I didn’t look into it yet.
Is it possible that a university that turned a blind eye to the rape of young boys might also turn a blind eye to falsified data? Maybe Mann was just “horseplaying” with the data sets.
Sometimes you gotta wrap your arms around it and just give it a big hug.
Like embracing bristlecone pines? Then not so much?
In Briffa’s case it was a”lonesome pine”.
I read the emails on Tallbloke. Not much science discussed. They didn’t have time. They were too busy trying to figure out how to manipulate the public perception of climate change.
They did have time to slam Judith Curry for straying too far from the reservation.
I think its probable that there is criminal activity going on there. Here’s more from the e-mails…..
Bradley:
I’m sure you agree–the Mann/Jones GRL paper was truly pathetic and should
never have been published. I don’t want to be associated with that 2000 year
“reconstruction”.
Osborn:
Because how can we be critical of Crowley for throwing out 40-years in the
middle of his calibration, when we’re throwing out all post-1960 data ‘cos the
MXD has a non-temperature signal in it, and also all pre-1881 or pre-1871 data
‘cos the temperature data may have a non-temperature signal in it!
Esper:
Now, you Keith complain about the way we introduced our result, while saying it
is an important one. [...] the IPCC curve needs to be improved according to
missing long-term declining trends/signals, which were removed (by
dendrochronologists!) before Mann merged the local records together. So, why
don’t you want to let the result into science?
Cook:
I am afraid that Mike is defending something that increasingly can not be
defended. He is investing too much personal stuff in this and not letting the
science move ahead.
you need to post this on WUWT…in response to “the physicist”
kk
This will run & run.
http://nigguraths.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/climategate-ii-more-skeletons-in-the-closet-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/
http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/11/climategate-2011-foia.html
http://www.climatedepot.com/
These climate whistel blowers are great. The warmist machine was pumping out tons of propaganda to coincide with the COp 17 fandango, and then the whistleblowers under-cut them with more leaked emails.
Thanks FOIA, Steve and a special shout-out to all you Nitwits Lyin at Penn State.