Greenies dream of cold weather, while working to reduce energy availability. The only rational reason for that could be a desire to see many people die.
http://news.google.com/newspapers
Greenies dream of cold weather, while working to reduce energy availability. The only rational reason for that could be a desire to see many people die.
http://news.google.com/newspapers
John is about as useless as Paul when it comes to their PREDICTIONS since the 60s and 70s, why anybody listens to them i do not have the foggyist idea. Both of them useless as TITS on a BULL!!!
That is the only logical conclusion.
I picture a future time of unlimited free energy, via hot or cold fusion, whatever. Advocates of this point to mundane benefits like boutiful water desalination + alleviation of hardship in the third world.
But I see the possible ‘frivolous’ things. Like ~costless hydrogen & flying cars. Or, take Big Bear CA with its ~4 month ski season. With unlimited free energy they could run snow machines all year. But even I think, even if there was no $ cost at all and no cost to the environment –absolutely no cost at all — it would still “be a bit much.” But if it were truly costless, there would be nothing wrong with doing it. This is the secular liberal guilt. I don’t want to describe it in detail, but it is not rational. And the target of the guilt is not just what may be called extravagant.
Energy allows our mobility, and undergirds the factories that have lifted us out of drudgery. So, the one thing that allows man to rise, is the target. It’s the ‘sacrificial offering’ to atone. This gives birth to dreams as expressed in the following: