Federal report: Arctic much worse since 2006
By SETH BORENSTEIN | AP – 5 hrs ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal officials say the Arctic region has changed dramatically in the past five years — for the worse.
It’s melting at a near record pace, and it’s darkening and absorbing too much of the sun’s heat.
Right. NSIDC reported in their last Arctic Sea Ice News that autumn freeze up was 40% faster than normal. It is pitch black in the Arctic, and ice extent is essentially identical to 1996.
The Arctic acts as Earth’s refrigerator, cooling the planet. What’s happening, scientists said, is like someone pushing the fridge’s thermostat much too high.
DMI reports that temperatures near the pole have been close to the long term mean for the past seven months.
“It’s not cooling as well as it used to,” Richter-Menge said.
The dramatic changes are from both man-made global warming and recent localized weather shifts, which were on top of the longer term warming trend, scientists said.
Right. Walt Meier at NSIDC says that it was warmer in Greenland 70 years ago.
The report, written by 121 scientists from around the world, said statistics point to a shift in the Arctic health in 2006. That was right before 2007, when a mix of weather conditions and changing climate led to a record loss of sea ice, from which the region has never recovered. This summer’s sea ice melt was the second worst on record, a tad behind 2007.
In other words, the trend since 2007 is upwards.
“We’ve got a new normal,” said co-author Don Perovich, a geophysicist at the Army Corps of Engineers Cold Research and Engineering Lab. “Whether it’s a tipping point and we’ll never recover, who’s to say?”
We do have a new normal. Climate scientists constantly making completely unsupportable claims while climate conferences are happening in exotic resorts. These people are hoping to keep the money flowing in and will say anything to maintain their lifestyle.
The report highlighted statistics to show an Arctic undergoing change:
—A NASA satellite found that 430 billion metric tons of ice melted in Greenland from 2010 to 2011, and the melting is accelerating. Since 2000, Greenland’s 39 widest glaciers shrunk by nearly 530 square miles, about the equivalent of 22 Manhattans.
Satellites are pieces of metal. They don’t find anything. People on the other hand often misinterpret data collected from equipment on satellites. Sea level has dropped dramatically since the start of 2010. This tells us that the net balance of ice is probably positive, not negative. It also tells us that the people making these claims are probably incompetent.
Multi-year ice has increased by almost 50% over the last three years. The ice is recovering, but they choose to ignore it.
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20111004_Figure6.png
h/t to Ira

Soon the 4 yr ice becomes 5, 3 becomes 4 etc and the chart will have a recognizable up trend at all ages.
Not till after the next melt season, the “birthday” for this year has already happened. That figure shows the age after the birthday party, which is why all the ice is scored as 1+ years and there’s no “new ice”.
And no, it’s not guaranteed that the 4+ cohort will expand next year. Look at the 3+ cohort – see how it expands between 2009 and 2010? Logically therefore there should have been an increase in 4+ ice between 2010 and 2011. There wasn’t, because it was located in vulnerable areas of the Beaufort sea and melted out, or conversely was advected through the Fram strait.
Pure, unadulterated propaganda, made up on the fly. The sad part is that people are fed this drool on the preformulated news shows and lap it all up. Then say we are paranoid and anti-science because we don’t believe it!
Well, welcome to Salem.
(I’m quoting from an earlier PC episode.)
They sound like a bunch of school girls telling each other scary stories on Halloween. Mass hysteria? Or from Webster’s…
Definition of ARCTIC HYSTERIA
: a form of individual and mass hysteria that is peculiar to Arctic peoples and is characterized by compulsive mimicry.
The problem is that there is no balance to any of these claims. Every newspaper that subscribes to the AP for their news, and that’s most of them, runs exactly the same story, no questions asked. Never in my life have I seen such perverted science. A questioning press would have looked for other voices. Not today when the news is indistingiushable from PRAVDA of old USSR days. We get nothing but one-sided stories from today’s pseudojournalists who never question anything.
Looks like we have past the bottom of a sine-wave. 60 year cycle?
Australia’s own high priest of AGW worship is behind the current spin. We should all demand a Royal Commision ino the science corruption & the political control exerted by a few NGO’s.
http://chimalaya.org/2011/09/08/500-million-people-will-be-displaced-by-glaciers/
I wonder if chimalaya. org will reprint this Forbes piece…
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2011/12/01/salvaging-the-mythology-of-man-caused-global-warming/
Probably not.