http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/uahncdc.lt
Our top scientists tell us to expect 7-12C warming, above and beyond the 0.12C which has already occurred.
I think a speedup of 50 to 100x for no particular reason is well within the range of natural psychosis variability at at the GISS looney bin.
What happened to Global Warming – forget the Man-Made Global Warming, what about the plain old 5-7 degrees (degree C? F? Who cares, you pick…) hotter by 2100 predictions?
At the pathetic rate of delta T we see now we are never going to get there. We are losing the CAWG numbers game. Isn’t temperature suppose to be increasing logarithmically with CO2? Shouldn’t we have already seen accelerated heating instead of no heating? If logarithmic, CO2 increases will have a lessening heat impact; not an accelerating impact.
Sea level rise is also pooping out.
http://www.aviso.oceanobs.com/en/news/ocean-indicators/mean-sea-level/
At this rate, if projected linearly, we will only get around 11 inches by 2100 as opposed to “meters” of sea-level rise.
Somebody needs to get the word to the jaw-jacking yakmeisters at Durban that their “greatest crisis facing humanity” just isn’t happening for some reason.
After the latest “findings” as revealed by BEST, more and more it looks to me like Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than noise around a poorly measured signal dressed up in all the latest lefty fashion thinking.
The Right Wing conspirators are hiding the warming at a secret location to make everyone think it is not happening and when people really start to doubt any warming is taking place those dastardly rats will release it all at once.
They are probably holding it ransom and the world governments are in secret negotiations to get it released.
We have actually lost 2.5 millimeters per year of sea level for the past 4 years. At this rate, by 2100 the seas will have dropped about 9 inches. Oh the huge manatee!
Yes, but who stole it? Where is it?
But Professor Obama said hottest year ever ever
You say this now…but just wait until the appropriate corrections are made to make sure the observations match the models.
If you go to the Canadian Ice Service site and get the data for Northern Canadian Waters you’ll find that the ice area for this week, this year (10/29/11) is now above the long term average and also, greater than the the ice area for all years since 1999.
The rapid growth rate this year has taken the ice area in that region from a low in September to an 11 year high.
And UAH is heading downhill for the start of November. We could well see Nov in negative territory.