Antarctic Drives Global Warming – 1,000 Years In Advance

You can’t make this stuff up. This week has produced the most inanely stupid global warming study in history.

The results show that while temperature increases around Antarctica appear to have led increases in atmospheric CO2, the picture globally was the opposite – CO2 increases paved the way for temperature increases.

Ice age study delivers blow to global-warming skeptics – CSMonitor.com

In Antarctica, CO2 lags temperature by 800 years. The new study says that the rest of the planet lags CO2 by several hundred years.

If that were true, it would mean that Antarctica drives the global temperature, and the rest of the planet follows 1,000 years later.

Whoever is responsible for this study needs a brain transplant. It is stupid beyond comprehension.

pixel Antarctic Drives Global Warming   1,000 Years In Advance
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Antarctic Drives Global Warming – 1,000 Years In Advance

  1. avatar KirkMyers says:

    It has become evident that the silly people who call themselves scientists live in another world. At some point, we’ll hear Michael Mann shout, “Toto, I don’t think we’re Kansas anymore,” as he digs his car out of the snow, gets his last PSU paycheck and heads for Cancun.

  2. avatar woodNfish says:

    “Whoever is responsible for this study needs a brain transplant. It is stupid beyond comprehension.”

    That sort of makes it the typical alarmist propaganda doesn’t it? No one with a lick of sense believes these Chicken Little’s anymore.

  3. So, basically the Real Peer-Reviewed Credible Consensus Science®© is that it’ll be -60°C globally in 1000 years? Egad!

  4. I love this sound bite: “CO2 increases paved the way for temperature increases.”

    Where did the extra CO2 come from? Well, out-gassing from the oceans.

    What caused the oceans to out-gas? Well, they have to warm first of course…

    Sort of reminds me of Dumb & Dumber. First you come up with a speculative hypothesis that can never be proven or falsified. (This is the dumb part.) Then you misrepresent the study by claiming it’s a blow to the ‘sceptics’. (This the dumber part.)

  5. avatar jim karlock says:

    Lets see if I have this right:
    1. Something caused antarctic temperature to rise.
    2. 800 years later CO2 rose
    3. Some years later the rest of the world’s temperature rose.

    Why do we need the CO2 in that sequence?
    Couldn’t whatever caused the Antarctic rise have also caused the rest of the world’s rise?

    Thanks
    JK

  6. avatar Tomwys says:

    These days the temperature rise comes from Hot Air delivered by interpretations such as “Ice age study delivers blow to global-warming skeptics – CSMonitor.com”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>