One of the most flagrant lies from the IPCC, the EPA, and the Hey-Ho, is that glacial retreat is due to CO2.
Sydney Morning Herald : January 13, 1939
“In fact,” said Professor Speight, “no case is recorded of a region of the world in which there are present signs of an advance.
In Alaska glaciers had been retreating from 100 to 200 years, the average rate of recession being about 50 feet a year.
Photographs taken in 1896 and 1935 showed that several glaciers had retreated distances varying from 100 yards to half a mile in 40 years.
One of the riddles which is puzzling geologists all over the world is the con-tinuous retreat of the ice glaciers. Does this phenomenon indicate that the sun is getting hotter as some astro- nomers believe or is it dependent uponcomparatively unimportant changes in the earth’s atmosphere ?
Consideration such as these were discussed by Professor R. Speight, formerly professor of geology at Canterbury College, Christchurch, New Zealand and now curator of the Canter-
bury Museum. In his presidential address to the geology section of the Science Congress to-day. His subject was “Some Aspects of Glaciation in New Zealand.”
The steady retreat of the glaciers in New Zealand he said had been observed during the last 70 years. Photographs taken in 1896 and 1935 showed that several glaciers had retreated distances varying from 100 yards to half a mile in 40 years.
WORLD-WIDE PHENOMENON
The phenomenon, however, was world-wide. Equally impressive records were obtainable from Switzerland, Scandinavia, Iceland and the United States. Attempts had been made to reconcile these observations with the Bruckner cycle of climate change every 16 years. Pro- fessor Speight said, but so many discrepan- cies occurred that in his opinion precise synchronisation with that period could not be accepted.
In Alaska glaciers had been retreating from 100 to 200 years, the average rate of recession being about 50 feet a year. The Antarctic ice- sheet also showed signs of recent retreat.
“In fact,” said Professor Speight, “no case is recorded of a region of the world in which there are present signs of an advance. This is quite apart from the general retreat since the pleistocene age and may be merely a pacing phase. Its precise significance can only be determined by continued observation.”

Obviously it’s all the added H2O from the burning of hydrocarbons.
Hey Steve,
I include the passage away from the Little Ice Age that we’ve been in for 150-plus years in my book. If you’re motivated to post about it, that would be much appreciated. One excerpt is here:
http://bit.ly/sfgFOa
Another here:
http://bit.ly/umfr5Q
And the Amazon link for those who just have to buy it right now is here:
http://amzn.to/w3FQx8
Thank you!
Harold
Great find Steve. Really important to bookmark this. Now let’s pound this into the liberals’ heads, shall we?
Here is a copy/paste ready-made link for people to use elsewhere …
[from Real Science - <B><A HREF="http://www.real-science.com/1939-worlds-glaciers-retreat">1939 : All Of The World’s Glaciers In Retreat</A></B>]
This is what that code will look like in a comment …
[from Real Science - 1939 : All Of The World’s Glaciers In Retreat]
Why does no-one ever think ‘Hey, it must be getting drier’?
They all have one track minds – temperature.
I visualize the LIA as being dark, cloudy and rainy (with lots of snow up in the mountains).
Pretty much what made Algore look foolish on Kilimanjaro.
We are coming out of an ice age. Glaciers should be melting.